Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus

MUSIC
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays
Horns of plenty
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me

ISSUES & IDEAS
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse
Apartheid in court
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest

PHILANTHROPY
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech

SPORT
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

GONE WITH THE WIND

  • Art & auction

A RUSSIAN FUTURIST WITH AN IMPECCABLE PEDIGREE | April 13th 2008

Bonhams

Natalia Goncharova's futurist works whooshed to prominence as part of the Russian avant-garde, then quickly fell out of style. Fiammetta Rocco, Books and Arts editor of The Economist, predicts a resurgence ...

From ECONOMIST.COM*

Natalia Goncharova loved speed. She loved it in 1912 when she painted "Les Rameurs" ("The Oarsmen"), which sold two years ago for over £1m ($2m), nearly seven times its pre-sale estimate. She loved it the following year, when she painted "Cyclist", which is now on show, wheels whirring and head bent low, in London at the Royal Academy's "From Russia" show. And she loved it still when she left Russia with the advent of the revolution in 1917 and moved to Switzerland, where she painted "Sailboat" (pictured), a small blue picture of great skill and dynamism that comes up for sale in early June.

Born in 1881, Goncharova was a central figure of the Russian avant-garde in the early 20th century. She began studying sculpture in Moscow when she was only 20, but quickly moved on to drawing and pastels. There she came under the influence of the French Impressionists and Post-Impressionists, whose work was bought in number and with great enthusiasm by Ivan Morozov and Sergei Shchukin (who also bought "Cyclist"). And she made a close study of the ideas of the Italian futurists, who were the speed queens of their age.

Together with Mikhail Larionov, the painter she married and with whom she would eventually leave Russia and settle in Paris, Goncharova developed Rayonnism, a distinctive modernist style whose most common features are reflected rays of light painted with colour and lines.

But the thrill Goncharova felt at being at the centre of the most innovative period of Russian art, and the excitement generated by her first retrospective in Moscow vanished nearly as quickly as it had blossomed. By the 1950s, war, dislocation and the changing fashions in art combined to force the couple virtually into penury. They were all but forgotten.

It was at this moment that they were introduced to Sir John Rothenstein, the director of the Tate Gallery, whose impeccable eye and unusual openness to people drew him to the world of the Russian émigré painters in France, including Marc Chagall and the widow of Vassily Kandinsky, who had died in 1944.

"We established an immediate understanding," he wrote in his diary on June 30th 1953, after meeting Goncharova and Larionov in Paris where they were living. "He seemed to like my few comments on Goncharova's work and his own (wh. he keeps in the background) and said, ‘There can only be abt 4 or 5 people like you alive just now.' V much touched. Chose works for offer to TG [Tate Gallery] and he wants me to have one."

Rothenstein was instrumental in acquiring several Goncharovas for the Tate, including "Linen", which was painted in 1913, the same year she painted "Cyclist" and held her Moscow retrospective, and "Three Young Women", which dates from 1920.

But the picture he kept for his private collection was among the most interesting. The blue painting features a boat, speeding leftwards. The waves are tipped with white and the sail, marked "NG1", billows out in the foreground. You can't see the hands of the figure at the tiller, or those of his companion in the front of the boat, but you know they are pulling tight.

The most surprising features of the painting, though, are the two vertical divides. On the right of the picture the sail is sunny and white on one side of the dividing line and dark grey on the other. On the left, a monumental, dead tree reaches the whole way up the picture, its branches lopped off. Both the tree and the bi-coloured sail represent some of the strongest themes of Goncharova's work: love and loss; life and death.

In less skilful hands the vertical divides might have put paid to any sense of speed or forward movement. Not here. The sailboat hurtles along, its two anonymous figures hell-bent on stopping themselves from losing all control.

"Sailboat" has been in the Rothenstein family for more than half a century. His heirs have finally been enticed to sell by the recent high prices Goncharova has achieved. Last June "Picking Apples", which she painted in 1909, sold at Christie's Modern and Impressionist sale in London for £4.9m, making her the world's most expensive female painter.

The unbroken Rothenstein provenance will reassure buyers who might be nervous about the increasing number of fake Russian avant-garde paintings that have sprung onto the growing market--an important feature if you want to sell for millions.

That the Rothenstein family has chosen to sell the painting through Bonhams with no firm guarantee, and in a Russian sale rather than the more fashionable Modern and Impressionist sale, is an interesting bet.

The picture was shown to all three auction houses. Sotheby's was ruled out almost immediately. Christie's, which boasted it had ten serious buyers interested in the record-breaking "Picking Apples" last year, came close to winning the commission, but in the end it lost out to Bonhams, which came as something of a shock to the King Street firm.

Bonhams is by a long measure the third most important of the auction houses, but this also makes it the Avis of sale rooms. "We try harder" was the car hire firm's slogan. Bonhams, for whom a £2m painting is a big deal, is trying far harder than its rivals. It proposed the best financial terms to the Rothenstein heirs.

But this alone would not have won it the deal. Bonhams was the only one of the three to offer "Sailboat" its own individual catalogue, printed in both English and Russian.

It has already started advertising the picture in the British press, with further advertising planned in Russia and in Ukraine. And it is sending it on an impressive roadshow: first Paris, then Moscow where it will be shown at a private reception at the British Embassy, and finally New York where it will be the centrepiece of Bonhams' new sale room, which opens on May 8th.

If the picture doesn't sell well after all that effort, the markets really are crumbling.

"Sailboat" by Natalia Goncharova will be the star lot of Bonhams' Russian sale in London on June 9th 2008 (Estimate: £1.5m-2m).

(*Fiammetta Rocco writes the Art.view column on economist.com, and is the author of "The Miraculous Fever-tree".)

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Have you found what you're looking for?
  • Please make it stop!
  • Yes, quite often when I'm in the queue to pick up the munchkins,
  • Agreed Adelle, just like any
  • Humor differences
  • But of course
  • Shakespeare thinking -- rhetorically
  • No Henry Owings?! All these
  • Misinterpreting Middlemarch
  • Laughing is highest achivement of mankind.


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs