Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus

MUSIC
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays
Horns of plenty
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me

ISSUES & IDEAS
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse
Apartheid in court
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest

PHILANTHROPY
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech

SPORT
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

WATCHING "SHINE A LIGHT"

  • film
  • MUSIC

SYMPATHY FOR THOSE DEVILS | April 11th 2008

Samira Khan/Flickr                   

James Woodall is no fan of the Rolling Stones. He had hoped to find more reasons to love the superannuated band in Martin Scorcese's dazzling "Shine A Light". Alas, he only found a love-in ...  

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE

Rock fans everywhere are licking their lips at the release of "Shine A Light", Martin Scorsese's new documentary about the Rolling Stones. The band's screamily trailed presence at the world premiere, which opened Berlin's film festival in February, had the German capital a-flutter for weeks.

As the Stones arrived, a scrum had gathered to ogle the four rockers--Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Charlie Watts--sashay down the red carpet. The effect was not unlike a scene from a religious cult: whoops, screams of adulation, an Armageddon of camera-flashing.

Jagger, while never discouraging the weird shiver he seems to inspire in millions of the world's rock public, tends to address the hordes like an ever-so-slightly impatient gym teacher. So he was at the packed Berlin press conference. In gravelly tones and always squinting, he took charge of proceedings barely before he'd sat down.

Filmed over two nights at New York's Beacon Theater in autumn 2006, "Shine A Light" shows the band in lightning form, fronted by the bendy, über-athletic vocalist, whose tireless immodesty remains the most endearing thing about him.

The film is technically dazzling. One gets a sense of the event's intimacy--the Beacon seats just 2,600 people--and of a band genuinely enjoying itself. With a multiplicity of angles (17 cameras rove round various parts of the theatre), these two hours reveal the Stones in fleshy, in-your-face close-up.

Yet the superannuated band is not always well-served by such proximity: Watts phlegmatic, seeming to pat rather than whack his drums; sinewy, pantomimic Wood, with low-slung guitar; Richards, aging gypsy dreamer that he is, in raddled ecstasy, soloing a fine "You Got the Silver". Jagger, marching and flailing all over the place, whipping his audience into gales of pleasured recognition.

But Jagger's voice has become monotonous. It is impossible not to have some doubts about a 63-year-old--however flat his stomach, however mini his hips--rustling up musical energies (if not from beyond the grave exactly, then) from a time long before punk. It is as if he is caricaturing himself from some dreadful late 1960s TV variety show. Even then, he was much more of a prancer than dancer.

Still, the old hits are here--"Jumping Jack Flash", "Sympathy for the Devil", "Brown Sugar". The best moments are when the band is joined by Buddy Guy, a brilliant old blues man, for a rendition of "Champagne and Reefer", and when Jagger slings a white electric guitar over his shoulder to join his two guitar regulars for a thrumming, visceral "Some Girls".

Both numbers point up the band's elemental strengths: their lashing blues base and their essential structure as a guitar band (just watch those three budding pensioners axe away in "Some Girls"). Rock'n'roll gets neither longer in the tooth nor more basic than this.

I should declare an interest or, perhaps, an unfortunate non-interest. I am not a Rolling Stones fan (though I once saw them live--at Knebworth in southern England, in 1976; half a mile away, Jagger poured a bucket of water over himself. I found their whole performance rather long). Martin Scorsese quite obviously is a fan, as well as a great film-maker.

Throughout his career, he has yoked his trade with his passion for rock--working on the film of the 1969 festival at Woodstock and directing the peerless "The Last Waltz", featuring the final live performance of the group The Band in 1976. Scorsese's most recent foray into the rock world was his probing 2005 portrait of Bob Dylan, "No Direction Home".

But what made the Dylan film work is absent from "Shine A Light". "No Direction Home" features fascinating concert footage, with substantial interviews and searingly intelligent self-analysis by the protagonist. Whether you're a Dylan fan or not, you learn something: about folk music, the 1960s in America, and about the inner biography of this most elusive musician.

"Shine A Light", however, is a fan letter, a love-in with the band. Archived interviews with Jagger or Richards seem to be inserted like ad-breaks. The film is slightly more than a promo, but not much. It is, finally, just a filmed concert.

Legions of Rolling Stones fans will nonetheless be delighted. For curmudgeons like me, "Shine A Light" should have the power to convert, but I came out feeling bored. If Martin Scorsese is to continue in this vein--apparently he has Bob Marley and George Harrison lined up--he might consider retiring his fan's shoes and donning his master-storyteller ones.                                                                                       

"Shine A Light" is out on general release. A double CD of the same title is on the Interscope Records label.

(James Woodall is a writer based in Berlin.)

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Your review

Submitted by James Baldwin (not verified) on April 11, 2008 - 20:15.
Nice read. Thank you. Jim Baldwin Spokane WA http://LetHerIn.org
  • reply

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Have you found what you're looking for?
  • Please make it stop!
  • Yes, quite often when I'm in the queue to pick up the munchkins,
  • Agreed Adelle, just like any
  • Humor differences
  • But of course
  • Shakespeare thinking -- rhetorically
  • No Henry Owings?! All these
  • Misinterpreting Middlemarch
  • Laughing is highest achivement of mankind.


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs