Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus

MUSIC
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays
Horns of plenty
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me

ISSUES & IDEAS
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse
Apartheid in court
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest

PHILANTHROPY
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech

SPORT
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

"DESIGN AND THE ELASTIC MIND"

  • FINE & PERFORMING ARTS

FUNCTION FOLLOWS FORM | April 19th 2008

Tomáš Gabzdil Libertíny (Slovak, born 1979) Studio Libertiny (The Netherlands, est. 2006) With a Little Help of the Bees vase. Prototype. 2006 Beeswax, 9 x 5 1/2 x 5 1/2" (23 x 14 x 14 cm) Image by Raoul Kramer

At the MoMA exhibition "Design and the Elastic Mind", the ringing message is that design matters. Ariel Ramchandani visits this "science fair on hallucinogens" and likes what she sees ...

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE

"Design and the Elastic Mind" is not your parents' science fiction. No stark white backgrounds, Blade Runner fantasies or post-apocalyptic wastelands. It's no conventional art show either. This is a science fair on hallucinogens--an exuberant garage-sale grab-bag funhouse of the fictional future. It seems the MoMA's talented Paola Antonelli didn't curate as much as accumulate, with exhibits gathering round in choreographed entropy. Try not to blink under the neon glare--you might miss something.

This giant exhibition features upwards of 250 pieces, many of them interconnected. The exhibits are grouped thematically, so internet experiments are displayed together, as are installations that deal with human emotion. But the true organising principle of the show is, "the exploration of the relationship between design and science and the approach to scale."

This may be the first MoMA show where I saw children having fun: touching everything, crawling into exhibits, and then crying when they were kept from playing with the shiny, metallic objects. The sense of wonder is infectious. Geeky exclamations slip out at every turn. A stem-cell suit for a mouse? Gadzooks!

The show successfully illustrates the intersection of science and design, often proving them to be two sides of a coin. As viewers, we revel in the detail-oriented (and often beautiful) craft of these innovators, who are stubbornly incapable of accepting things as they are.

The works range in scale, from tinkerings with miniscule bits and building blocks (genes, pins, screws), to experiments with all that is infinite and nebulous (urban plans, the universe, the internet). This wide net is meant to illustrate the sweeping impact of design--each explanatory tag has a diagram that illustrates how the object mediates between an individual, a group, society and the universe. They're a bit abstract; if you ask me it's better just to look.

Antonelli explained to a lucky group of us on a guided tour that this collaboration between scientists and designers is a productive one, because practitioners in both fields tend to feel inaccessible to the public. Good design can translate scientific innovation into something more digestible, while science can lend design more meaning.

In addition to oscillating between the miniscule and gargantuan, this show also curiously navigates the territory between the hyper-useful and hyper-useless. A vase-looking device that employs bees in early cancer detection draws a stark contrast with a graft of a loved one's nipple, DNA manipulated to create smiley faces (pictured right). Tacky science? Who knew such a thing existed. (Gadzooks, again.) Science goes down, design goes up (zero-sum, in this instance).

What's also fascinating about this multi-levelled science/design collaboration is the powerful and definitive idea of design's importance. We believe in science already; Antonelli pushes us to put our faith in design, too. The show concentrates on the "designers' ability to grasp momentous changes in technology, science, and social mores, changes that will demand or reflect major adjustments in human behaviour, and convert them into objects and systems that people understand and use." Design is not a joke (smiley-faced DNA and fictional futures aside). The art of making functional stuff look nice is not to be taken lightly.

And most of the exhibit looks better than just nice. Chairs immediately moulded from the 3-D printer develop with a sinuous, organic beauty. A digital map of the internet is as lovely as fireworks on the 4th of July, a far away galaxy (pictured right).

"Of course, everyone has a right to beauty," Antonelli quipped during our tour. Objects "that people understand and use" include shoes, drinking fountains and golfballs, as well as computer interfaces, holograms and space suits. Design--lowly, practical design--elevates everyday objects, turning the ordinary into the extraordinary.

Whether you buy into it or not, this is a call for beauty; at any level, at any price point, on every scale, for every person (no wonder kids were trying to reach out and touch it). Ringing through the cavernous space like church bells is the assertion that design matters, that it will help us leave today and enter tomorrow.

Design and the Elastic Mind is at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, until May 12th 2008.

(Ariel Ramchandani is a contributing editor to More Intelligent Life)


Images: Paul W. K. Rothemund (American, born 1972) California Institute of Technology (USA, est. 1891) DNA origami. Prototype. 2004-05 Natural and synthetic DNA molecules, 100 nanometers diam. Synthetic DNA manufactured by Integrated DNA Technologies, USA (2004-05). Models rendered in laser etched glass by Bathsheba Sculpture LLC, USA (2008) Image by Paul W. K. Rothemund

Barrett Lyon (American, born 1978) The Opte Project (USA, est. 2003) Mapping the Internet. 2003 Opte software Image by Barrett Lyon

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Have you found what you're looking for?
  • Please make it stop!
  • Yes, quite often when I'm in the queue to pick up the munchkins,
  • Agreed Adelle, just like any
  • Humor differences
  • But of course
  • Shakespeare thinking -- rhetorically
  • No Henry Owings?! All these
  • Misinterpreting Middlemarch
  • Laughing is highest achivement of mankind.


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs