Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus

MUSIC
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays
Horns of plenty
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me

ISSUES & IDEAS
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse
Apartheid in court
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest

PHILANTHROPY
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech

SPORT
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

OUR GUIDE TO THE BEST CRITICS: FILM

  • film

BLUNT CANDOUR AND DONNISH INTELLECT | March 10th 2008

[Image]
mutednarayan/Flickr

In our second instalment of "Reviewers revered", Julie Kavanagh, Jasper Rees and others name their favourite film critics. Anthony Lane earns the most plaudits, even among those who rarely go to the cinema. (Read our introduction to the series here, and our selection of favourite book critics here) ...

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, Spring 2008

In our list below, the name at the top is the nominee, and the nominator is listed as a sign-off. For more about our contributors, see our introduction.

*****

ANTHONY LANE

(The New Yorker, every other Monday)

Lane, who is English, vaulted to the New Yorker from the Independent on Sunday in 1993: the critic as unimpeachable stylist. His sentences are lovely, delivering their goods with an uncrotchety humour that seems to fall in with the pace of your own best thinking and feeling. He's a very flattering writer. ~ NICK COLEMAN

Before seeing a movie I always check the New Yorker site to find out if Anthony Lane has reviewed it. A young Brit with a donnish intellect, the wit of Clive James and a voice entirely his own, he has a big following in America, but is known only to devotees back home. I often return to his collection "Nobody's Perfect" (Picador, 2002) for a rush of inspiration. ~ JULIE KAVANAGH

He is so entertaining and informed that I read him religiously, even though I hardly go to the cinema. ~ TOM STANDAGE

It used to be Adam Mars-Jones, but today it is Anthony Lane whose film reviews put into words what I wish I'd said myself but never could. He asks the questions the directors should have asked themselves, in a deft, clean process that is both funny and incredibly clever.
~ REBECCA WILLIS

The Rolls-Royce of film critics. Never mind the film, you read Lane for the sheer quality of the prose. ~ MICK BROWN

The least gushing, most incisive and funniest film critic. ~ SIMON GARFIELD

 

DAVID EDELSTEIN

(New York magazine, every Monday)

David Edelstein's reviews have the winning gruffness of someone thinking aloud. He's not trying to persuade you of anything, merely filing a report from the front row, with all the blunt candour of someone riding out his own unruly reactions. He levels with you, he doesn't try to impress, and says more things you want to steal than any other critic. I treasure his observation about how dangerous it is for a character in a biopic to develop a cough. ~ TOM SHONE

David Edelstein's artfully plain-spoken reviews--also found at Slate.com, where he was until 2005--bristle with a love of film and unfold with casual confidence. He will boldly praise goofy blockbusters and convincingly topple false idols (on "Atonement": "It doesn't fuck with your head"). Back when I was an intern, I sent him a piece of fan-mail, sand-bagged with reviews of my own. He responded immediately and reassured me that he, too, began his career spending "48 hours writing a 400-word review". "My advice is simple", he wrote: "Write." ~ EMILY BOBROW

 

PHILIP FRENCH

(The Observer, every Sunday)

Good critics provide an historical context without losing their enthusiasm for innovation. I've always enjoyed Philip French's reviews for that reason: if there's a parallel between the new Tarantino and a little-known Italian thriller of the 1930s, French can be relied on to spot it and to explain what it means. ~ BLAKE MORRISON

 

RYAN GILBEY

(The New Statesman, every Thursday)

For his exact dissections of why a film matters, and his uninsistent familiarity with cinema's backwaters. More than capable of turning an entertaining phrase, but never at the expense of the film, only in its service. Also quite brilliant at reporting without spoiling the ending. ~ ISABEL LLOYD

 

ANTHONY QUINN

(The Independent, every Friday)

The stand-out stylist among Fleet Street film critics, Quinn has an impeccable nose for quality in an art form which, more than any other, requires reviewers to sift through chaff. ok, so he's seldom wild about low-budget British fare, gross-out comedy or punishing releases from Kazakhstan, but you can put your faith in his lapidary judgments on the great American film-makers. ~ JASPER REES

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Anthony Lane then Nigel

Submitted by ricardo (not verified) on March 11, 2008 - 14:49.
Anthony Lane then Nigel Andrews. Lane's a better writer, Andrews has (marginally) superior taste. Others mentioned here are way behind.
  • reply

armand white?

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on March 12, 2008 - 21:37.
armand white?
  • reply

And on the radio

Submitted by Andy Croll (not verified) on March 13, 2008 - 00:13.
Mark Kermode. On FiveLive in the UK. Strong opinions and eclectic taste, but always worth listening too.
  • reply

Filthy critic?

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on March 13, 2008 - 08:20.
You've missed one. Sure, he's gratuitously vulgar and has a bad case of rock'n'roll attitude, but beyond the facade is a mind as sharp as any of the top critics: http://www.bigempire.com/filthy/
  • reply

David Thomsen

Submitted by julian Merrow-smith (not verified) on March 13, 2008 - 11:32.
No list of best film critics should exclude David Thomsen.
  • reply

I too so think! ---- online

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on June 23, 2008 - 18:43.
I too so think!
----
online movies
  • reply

Where are the blog reviewers

Submitted by Marilyn in Chicago (not verified) on March 13, 2008 - 15:39.
There are thousands of excellent film critics in the blogosphere from all over the world. It's frustrating to see the continued hegemony of critics from the print world (online versions of print publications just a new package for the same group of elites).
  • reply

Blog reviewers

Submitted by Emily_Bobrow on March 13, 2008 - 16:54.

We've included Jessa Crispin in our round-up of book critics; who would you like to anoint as a top film blogger? Are there really thousands of excellent ones? Feel free to name them.

  • reply

OK, here are a few

Submitted by Marilyn in Chicago (not verified) on March 14, 2008 - 21:14.
Thousands may be an exaggeration, but there are many, many great critics out there. Kimberly Lindbergs of Cinebeat (http://www.cinebeats.com/) makes all things 60s and 70s come alive. Peter Nellhaus of Coffee, Coffee, and More Coffee (http://www.coffeecoffeeandmorecoffee.com/) is witty and wise. Campespe at Self-Styled Siren (http://selfstyledsiren.blogspot.com/) does classic movies like no one else. Dennis Cozzalio at Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule (http://sergioleoneifr.blogspot.com/) is just simply great no matter what he writes about. The collective of film writers that is Cinematical (http://www.cinematical.com/) is like having an all-star team, all devoted to film. Michael Guillen at The Evening Class (http://theeveningclass.blogspot.com/) has a ton of insights and great taste. I could go on, but click on some of their links and you'll find lots more.
  • reply

Morgenstern

Submitted by tpw (not verified) on March 13, 2008 - 20:45.
Morgenstern from the WSJ (most Fridays) is pretty good.
  • reply

A.O. SCOTT!

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on March 14, 2008 - 16:31.
He should be at the top of this list, right?
  • reply

J. Hoberman

Submitted by Martin (not verified) on March 14, 2008 - 23:04.
That would be my addition to the list. Village Voice critic since the late Carter years. Vulgar Modernism is one of the sharpest books on cinema ever written.
  • reply

Indeed

Submitted by Emily_Bobrow on March 15, 2008 - 13:25.

Yes, he is surely the best thing still going at the Voice. (He wants films to succeed - he laments in their failure, rather than relishing shortcomings. The real thing.) A pity we didn't include him in the first round. Thanks for adding him to the list.

  • reply

stephanie zacharek

Submitted by josh (not verified) on March 16, 2008 - 03:58.
Stephanie Zacharek, at Salon.com, is among my favorite film critics.
  • reply

Armond White

Submitted by Visitor (not verified) on March 18, 2008 - 23:26.
Not Armond White! Every review is the same. He uses movies as an excuse to talk about his uninteresting moral beliefs.
  • reply

Geoff Andrew

Submitted by shehab hamad (not verified) on March 22, 2008 - 11:22.
Surely Geoff Andrew (Time Out, BFI) deserves a mention.
  • reply

Peter Bradshaw

Submitted by Peter Craughwell (not verified) on March 26, 2008 - 03:45.
I can't believe no-one has mentioned Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian. Droll and passionate in equal measure. I also salute the sub-editor who came up with the headline "Peter Bradshaw not smash Hulk. Kind to Hulk."
  • reply

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Have you found what you're looking for?
  • Please make it stop!
  • Yes, quite often when I'm in the queue to pick up the munchkins,
  • Agreed Adelle, just like any
  • Humor differences
  • But of course
  • Shakespeare thinking -- rhetorically
  • No Henry Owings?! All these
  • Misinterpreting Middlemarch
  • Laughing is highest achivement of mankind.


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs