Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus
The indexing trade
The memoir boom
Barnes & Noble Media

MUSIC
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"
American art in Dulwich
Natalia Goncharova
Tony Harrison's "Fram"
Design: Alexander von Vegesack
Circular tables at Christie's
Dani Karavan
Making a musical
Edward Weston's photographs
Richard Dadd at Bonhams
Hillary Carlip's "A la Cart"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me
Taillevent
La Mission Haut-Brion
Perfect cup of tea
Live food
Le Cinq at George V

ISSUES & IDEAS
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest
Sarkozy visits England
TEOTWAWKI
Beggars can be orators
Aldermaston march
Friend of a farmer
Commander-in-chief
"The New Cold War"
Epicurus exonerated
Lazy language, lazy thought
Cuba and the TRNC
Britain's silly tax laws

PHILANTHROPY
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech
What do people do in Antarctica?
Falling in love with DC
Eat in Peckham
Chicago sells well
Fun times in Maputo
Breaking into Burma
Dresden's rebirth
Birth bribes in Budapest
New York's cemeteries

SPORT
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

DON'T FIGHT ROOM TEMPERATURE

WHAT'S IN YOUR FRIDGE DOES NOT NEED TO BE THERE

Can you live in a city, without a refrigerator? Some green pioneers think so, and have been blogging their progress, reports Robert Butler, in an extract from his article in the current issue of Intelligent Life magazine ...

From INTELLIGENT LIFE magazine, September 2007

It was Greenpa who raised the issue of the refrigerator. Greenpa is a 58-year-old father of three. He started Little Blog in the Big Woods on March 24th 2007 after reading an article in the New York Times two days earlier about Colin Beavan, a guy trying to live with his family on Fifth Avenue without making any net impact on the environment.

Six days into his blog, Greenpa announced: “If you live in a city—you do not need a refrigerator...A great deal of what's in your fridge absolutely does NOT need to be there.” He listed the items and their shelf lives: butter lasts two weeks, eggs one week, tomatoes four days, peanut butter months. He explained how to seal meat so it keeps for three or four days.

His post was read in Toronto by Vanessa Farquharson, a woman who was trying to reduce her energy consumption by taking one new action each day. Thirty days in, she had decided that forgoing cold yogurt, ice cream and chilled white wine was not going to be one of them. “I made that spirally motion with my index finger next to my ear”, she wrote later, “because that's just crazy talk.” But Vanessa did inspect her fridge and noticed that inside there were two dials. On April 19th, 50 days in, a picture of her empty freezer appeared on her blog, Green as a Thistle. The freezer part had been switched off.

Over in Seattle, a blonde mother of two, who blogs as Crunchy Chicken, wrote to Vanessa: “We're not quite ready to make that step yet, but I'm rooting for you!” From his hideaway in the woods, Greenpa wrote to Vanessa too. “Brava!” Now he recommended that Vanessa start removing “the stuff in the fridge that really doesn't have to be there”.

Another 28 days on, Vanessa's blog had a photo of the empty interior of her fridge: “OK, listen up Little Blog in the Big Woods: I did it. I unplugged my fridge. Not just the freezer, the entire fridge. NO FRIDGE. Do I get green-freak status yet or what?” Six hours later, Greenpa wrote in with suggestions about carrots, kale and evaporative coolers. Over in San Diego, LaVonne Ellis, who had joined the 90% reduction challenge, linked on her blog to Greenpa, Colin Beavan and Vanessa with the words: “Wow. I've just experienced a mindshift.”

When it came to Green Freak status, the competition was hotting up. Four days before Vanessa had unplugged her fridge, Colin Beavan had gone and thrown the circuit breaker on his Fifth Avenue apartment, plunging his wife and two-year-old child into a world without an electric light, fridge, TV, kettle or vacuum cleaner. This is on the same street as Tiffany, Cartier and Saks! Colin had to write fast when posting the news on his blog as his computer was now powered by solar energy. The main problem, he said, other than brushing his teeth in the dark, was that he had been keeping his daughter Isabella's milk in a “pot fridge” and it wasn't cold enough.

“Mazel Tov,” wrote Sharon Astyk, a few hours later, from her farm near Knox in upstate New York. Sharon advised Colin to keep Isabella's milk in a bucket of cold water. OK, he might have to change the water occasionally, but, she assured him, “it will work”. As well as a farmer, Sharon Astyk is a 35-year-old mother of four and a lapsed PhD candidate in English Literature, who has blogged, forcefully and elegantly, at Casaubon's Book since 2004. Sharon has just completed her first month of “rioting for austerity”. On July 1st, she announced that “the big step will be the fridge turn off”. It certainly will be big: this is a family of six. After that, they are considering “going entirely without grid power”.

Not everyone approves of others pursuing the good life. Robert Louis Stevenson said Thoreau was a “skulker” and thought that “so many negative superiorities begin to smack a little of the prig”. Vanessa Farquharson's mother is not much keener. Four months into her year-long experiment, Vanessa writes: “My mother tells me that I smell, my hair looks crap and I'll never get a boyfriend."

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

 

Uhh real intelligent ???

Submitted by Visitor on September 12, 2007 - 08:58.
I am thrilled about Intelligent Life. I have been an Economist reader since the age of 15 when I first decided that I was much more conservative than most of my teachers! Your obejective for readers to, “gain better value from that most precious of resources: your time.” is most appreciated. Below is my devoted reader comment to guide you along this mission. The environment is once again a hot topic, and rightly so, it is important and touches everyone. However, It would be a most appreciated time saver if you would leave articles about not using one’s refrigerator to the bloggers who have time to conduct such experiments. I would like to share with you a quote as I remember it. I am not usually inclined to quote the late president of France, Jacques Chirac, but here goes anyway: You cannot have environmental change without advancement. Not using your fridge and subjecting your family to living without electritcity is egotistical baloney. What person in their right mind wants to subject their children to moving backwards in terms of quality of life? I do agree that you we don’t need to put so much stuff in the fridge. I feed a four person family, host sunday brunches and do plenty of entertaining with a one side, small, fridge on top, freezer on the bottom unit. What you could have wrote about instead in the Home section to help readers save Time … and Money: - New fridges that use less energy. - How to take care of your fridge so that it looses less energy, -Not letting food stuffs touch the walls of the fridges. -Cleaning routinely the cooling pipes. Turning the thing off while on vacation -Companies making cleaner a fridge, is there a difference? - Do you really need that Sub Zero? Or - How to prepare and store food in the freezer while it is in season, reducing the agriculture carbon footprint . At then end of day, it is a combination of a cleaner source of energy and more energy efficient appliances that will truly change the carbon footprint worldwide. Thank you however for the article about Honda. I personally don’t own a car, but maybe one day I will. This is useful time saving information. Cassandra Potier Watkins cassandrapw.blogspot.com Paris, France
  • reply

Efficient refrigerators are full refrigerators

Submitted by Visitor on September 15, 2007 - 02:35.
I would like to clarify a misconception in this article - that a refrigerator removed of unnecessary items, with only essential items remaining, is a more efficient refrigerator. In fact, the opposite is true. A refrigerator's contents are cooled by the air around them. When a refrigerator's door is opened, a lot of cool air escapes, and the refrigerator's cooling mechanism must then work hard to cool the warm air. A refrigerator with little in it has a lot of air, which will escape very quickly. However, a refrigerator which is almost completely full has little air, and a lot of items which retain their low temperature when the door is opened momentarily, meaning that the refrigerator does not need to work so hard to maintain it's temperature. I would suggest that people looking at removing unnecessary items from their refrigerators should fill the new space with bottles of water, or something similar, which would remain cool with an open door. This is a simple way to reduce the electricity consumption of refrigerators.
  • reply

It wasn't about efficiency-

Submitted by Visitor on September 22, 2007 - 16:32.
Hi, Visitor- your facts here about how a fridge works are basically correct- not totally, but we don't need to get into that. My point here is that I did not suggest Vanessa start taking stuff out of her fridge to increase its efficiency - but simply to show how little she had that actually NEEDED to be in there. People stick there eggs and butter in automatically- but they truly do not need refrigeration; nor does your mustard, etc... The idea your eggs don't have to be in the fridge takes a lot of getting used to; it's automatic, and pounded into us. And not true. Chickens do not refrigerate their eggs, while waiting the week, or more, it takes before they actually start incubating them. And they do not spoil- haven't for the last several millennia. The mind shift was the point. You're correct that an empty fridge will cycle on and off more frequently than a full one (though a full one will run LONGER...) Eventually she looked in and saw- almost nothing. And she says after some months of shifting habits that she doesn't really miss it. We've been taught that a fridge a necessity, though our grandparents survived without them; they use on average about 10% of all the power your house consumes- and many folks just don't need one. Lots of long discussions about it on my blog- :-) Greenpa
  • reply

Don't Believe the Spin

Submitted by Visitor on September 15, 2007 - 04:38.
Yah, whotever. My in-laws are these off-grid people. Their grooming and hygiene are poor, their food is bad, they are undernourished and unclean. Yet they never hesitate to proclaim their moral superiority to everyone else. Oh, did I mention there is one grid they are not off? They are on public assistance to subsidize their under-productive, parasitical lifestyle. Which is to say that we--everyone on-grid--get to pay for them to wag their fingers at us. Egotistical baloney indeed.
  • reply

Yeah your in-laws are dicks.

Submitted by Pruce Balling (not verified) on February 6, 2008 - 02:50.
Yeah your in-laws are dicks. What a couple of jerks. But on the other hand they are saving us money on electricity bills, makeup, clothes, soap and water while they ignore fashion and other spending trends and refuse to bathe- for whatever thats worth.
  • reply

Big love to the Bloggers written about in this article! :)

Submitted by Visitor on September 20, 2007 - 18:32.
How exciting to see an article about the enviro-bloggers I have found out about in the past few months! NIM is where it started for me and I am so happy to see them all getting press. :) *See as I attempt to ignore the nay sayers and poopooers posting comments. It's tough not to tell them to, well...%^#@!&~%, but I'm not going to!* :) Green as a Thistle's blog tag line is "Making one change everyday to greenify my life (and hopefully not being too smug about it)." I find that this sentiment runs through all of the blogs that these folks take the time to write. Greenpa says in his intro outlining some of his Green Practices "15) Shut up about it. Nobody likes preaching. 16. These are our choices- yours are yours." NIM also had a post about the growing pains he and his wife went through in trying not to police each other about their green habits. So, my hat is off to them! Keep it up. Thank you for inspiring me to think, evolve and live a happier life. :) Laura in Seattle
  • reply

Very Ironic

Submitted by Visitor on September 28, 2007 - 19:12.
We feel that these people have achieved something great by turning off refrigerators and are even living without grid power. Its a very good gesture but that's all that it is. While they may have reduced their direct energy consumption the majority of energy being consumed on their behalf is still being used. For example the energy cost of transporting the food, the public transport system that they use, the list is endless. Any way while I will be the first to admit that despite my misgivings it is a noble gesture and one that I will never be able to take. However we must keep in mind that most of the world life without a fridge is not an adventure or a sacrifice it is just their way of life.
  • reply

A positive step for a change in attitude.

Submitted by Anne-Marie (not verified) on April 23, 2008 - 13:21.
It's interesting that I stumbled across this article, as just last night I was wondering if I really needed a fridge. As a student living by myself, my fridge is often pretty much empty, with the exception of a few Tupperware boxes containing leftovers from last night's dinner. I believe these people who have chosen to go without a refrigerator are setting a good example for others. I am not saying that everyone should switch off their fridges, but this is a good example of how to open your minds to a greener way of life. Although I still use electricity at home, I try to use as little as possible, for example, by only switching on my hot water tank an hour before I want to have a shower (yes, I am green and I still shower), and switching it off immediately afterwards, and using my washing machine at the most energy efficient setting during the night, when demand for electricity is lower, helping to efficiently use up otherwise wasted nocturnal energy. I was therefore disappointed when reading the comments for this article, at some of the comments about people who have opted for this non-grid lifestyle; obviously I cannot speak for the apparently smelly in-laws mentioned above, but I was quite shocked to see such immature jabs being made at people who are trying to live in a more environmentally friendly way - which, by the way, is their perogative - and certainly the childish attitude that people who live without electricity must have poor hygeine, an attitude that I had believed to be on the way out as society realises that green living is not just for dreadlocked tree-hugging ecowarriors but for any modern, aware citizen of the world. It is true that a huge proportion of the world lives without electricity, let alone a fridge, and let us remember that up until the middle of the last century, most households in the Western world did not live with a fridge. Fridges are useful, yes, but they are also a shortcut. Most modern household appliances became available during the 1950s and 60s, making every housewife's life a lot easier. But ultimately they make people lazy and a little selfish. It would be very possible not to live without a fridge, if one took the time to make an effort and plan their grocery shopping accordingly and actually think about what they buy and eat. Frozen produce and processed foods are phenomenonly bad for you anyway, not to mention a hell of a lot more expensive (and less fun!) than buying fresh produce at the market, if one is available to you. Without trying to sound yummy-mummy and without trying to wag my finger at anybody, I personally have been taking steps to make my life greener. It's not about showing off or being better than others, it's about changing your attitude and being less selfish. Because forget the environment, millions of people all over the world live without modern appliances, why can't we? Of course I am not implying everyone go back to using candles and washboards - I could never get rid of my cell phone or computer, that's for sure - but I hope that people like those mentioned in this article inspire people to think about what they actually need, and what they could do without.
  • reply

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition



Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition



Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • um...maybe you should do some research.
  • But isn't the broader issue
  • More Ukridge
  • My goodness. Am I a
  • Maputo Article
  • "Can intelligence emerge
  • Keep up the good work :)
  • Awesome
  • nonfiction
  • Barbara, last year i ate the


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs