Subscribe to Intelligent Life

RECENT ARTICLES


LITERATURE
Zilahy's "The Last Window-Giraffe"
Writing workshops
Herodotus and the oracle
"Things Fall Apart"
Book critics we like
Memoirs of a nobody
Thomas Bernhard
Herodotus and bad fate
Norman Rush's "Mortals"
Herodotus and retrospection
Grace Paley's "Fidelity"
Herodotus and women
Norman Mailer
Reading Herodotus

MUSIC
My "Rock Band" band
Orchestral pleasures in Abu Dhabi
Sparks perform everything
Rock critics we like
Letting Bach breathe (audio)
Bryce Morrison on Hattogate
Music as installation art
The Joyce Hatto affair
The autumn IL playlist

FINE & PERFORMING ARTS
Bloomsbury ballerina
Hiccup in the Russian art market
Russians come to London
William Scott
Contemporary African art
In praise of short plays
Horns of plenty
Niall Hobhouse's collection
Louise Bourgeois chills
Larry Gagosian
Two Gauguins
New York's Armory Show
Two-headed bust at Bonham's
"Design and the Elastic Mind"

FILM
Tribeca Film Festival
Watching "Shine A Light"
Martin Sheen for president
Smoking on screen
Film critics we like
East Germany on screen
I love the Oscars
Scott Burns
British Council film festival
"The Man from Earth"
David Lynch
"Yiddish Theatre, a Love Story"
"La Chinoise"
"Helvetica"

FOOD & DRINK
Become a Master of Wine
Goodbye Peroni, hello Pinot Noir
Tokyo food
The people's lobster
The mission: soufflé
Australia's wine country
Well-tempered chocolatiers
Sipping Cos D'Estournel
It's offal good
Tasting Graves wines
Chateau Les Crayeres
Where the cabbies eat
Reading about wine
Wine and me

ISSUES & IDEAS
Great bores of yore
Yes, we are bit boring
Bright old things, Betty Stevens
Are men boring?
Bright old things, Diana Athill
Bright old things, Leo Abse
Apartheid in court
Decision making
A sceptic's pilgrimage
The BBC's decline
Freedom from the Olympics
High-end prostitution
The Diana Inquest

PHILANTHROPY
In pursuit of community
Robin Hood and the ARK
Your money or your life?
Donating to Afghanistan
One cause, or many?
Embedded giving
Giving for scholarship
Helping a beggar
Children and wealth
New Philanthropy Capital

PLACES
Ireland and the EU
A Mauritania diary
Nordic classrooms
Total eclipse
Flea markets
Monks and tigers in Sri Lanka
Jaffa's vanished glory
Gardens of eden
Walking all over the world
Mexican notes
McCain in Maryland
A Mali holiday
Living in Babel
Down in the Delta
My house in Marrakech

SPORT
EURO 2008
World's sexiest brakes
Olympic memorabilia
Watch cricket
Marathon training
Remembering Munich
Against the London Olympics
American exceptionalism
Rugby World Cup 2007 (ii)
Rugby World Cup 2007 (i)

TECHNOLOGY
Robots get cuddly
Redesigning the dinosaur
Interactive clothing
David Weinberger
Ned Kahn
Swarming robots

MISCELLANY
The summer issue is here
Shocking pink
TV, theatre, pop culture critics
Are you being followed?
The spring issue is here
Sex diaries of Keynes
New York cabs
Benjamin Franklin
Hitler's digestion
Life as a handbag
Stroke me, I'm a primate
The death of alpha-blogging
Swearing and Steven Pinker
Castration and sex

THE BITTER TRUTH ABOUT VICTORIAN BEER

IN PRAISE OF THE POST-INDUSTRIAL PINT | November 15th 2007

Chris Routledge wipes the foam from his lips, and explains that it's technology, not tradition, that makes better beer. The golden age of pre-industrial British beer is a marketing man's myth ...

Special to MORE INTELLIGENT LIFE

The rise of "real ale" has delighted British publicans and drinkers alike. In 1989 chains of pubs controlled by the big industrial breweries were required by law to sell at least one "guest" beer alongside the house beers, opening up a new market for smaller brewers and bringing some of them back from the brink of extinction. Breweries sprang up across the land from inner cities to Scottish islands such as Orkney and Arran. Old breweries such as Shepherd Neame in Kent, and Cain's in Liverpool, made much of their history and traditions.

The marketing of "real ale" typically evokes a Victorian golden age. One Yorkshire brewer, Timothy Taylor, sells its "Landlord" bottled ale with a label depicting a jolly 19th-century publican raising a frothing tankard. A Burton brewer, Marston's, sells a pale ale called "Old Empire", marketed as a "genuine IPA", using images of sailing ships and men with handlebar moustaches.

But how might these modern beers compare to their Victorian forebears in a blind tasting?

The answer is: surprisingly well, probably, at least when measured against the first Victorian beers.

In the early 19th century most brewers operated out of sheds and yards attached to pubs and brew-houses. In very cold or very warm weather they struggled to brew at all. Most beer was produced between September and May. As late as the 1860s beer was advertised by the barrel with the month in which it was brewed as an indication of quality.

Porters, stouts, and dark ales dominated the market. With some regional variation these were strong, heavy brews—and, because they were dark in colour, they were easy to adulterate. They were vatted and sold throughout the year as long as stocks held up, but most beer-drinking went on in the winter, when poor light and cold prevented outdoor work.

Then, as now, brewers fretted about the cost of ingredients such as hops and malt. But whereas excise duty is paid now on the finished product, before 1880 it was levied on the raw materials—and you cut costs where you could. The markets were cut-throat, especially in hops, which give beer its bitter flavour. The best are usually year-old (‘yearling') hops, just old enough to have mellowed a little. But to hedge against swings in the market, Victorian brewers stockpiled ingredients for years. Ten-year-old hops might be pressed into service, by which time they were all but flavourless.

Technology came to the rescue, improving on tradition. By the 1860s larger brewers were taking regular samples of water and learning to modify their recipes to take account of mineral levels. (High levels of calcium were good for producing bright, bitter beers—such as the pale ales of Burton. Dublin water had relatively low calcium content, ideal for brewing stout.) They brought in steam power and cooling systems; they experimented with sugar and malt substitutes such as maize and rice, to improve the stability of their brews and to meet the demand for freshness and clarity.

By the 1880s brewing was an industry, not a craft. The Laboratory Club, established by the chemist E.R. Moritz in 1886, was a place where brewers and brewing scientists could exchange information and develop their techniques. Moritz worked as a consultant for the brewers, providing chemical analysis. The days of variable, unpredictable, traditionally brewed ales were over—and both brewers and drinkers gave a sigh of relief.

The story, therefore, is a touch more complicated than the real-ale brewers (and their fans) would have you believe. They are making better use, not less use, of industry and science. Many "traditional brewers" transport their product around the country these days in unmarked tankers for fear of revealing the essentially industrial nature of their business. They are not going back to some artisanal, pre-industrial age, and you probably wouldn't like it if they did.

(Chris Routledge is a freelance writer and editor of The Reader Online. His book, "Cains: The Story of Liverpool in a Pint", will be published by Liverpool University Press in 2008.)

  • Add new comment
  • Printer-friendly version

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Stricter quality control

Submitted by Paul Garrard (not verified) on November 16, 2007 - 16:38.
Stricter quality control methods have no doubt improved things tremendously since God was a lad. Sadly you still get the odd pint that harks back to the Victorian era !
  • reply

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FROM THE MAGAZINE



Our Summer 2008 issue is on newsstands now


Read the complete text of the Spring 2008 edition


Read the complete text of the Winter 2007 edition


Read the complete text of the Autumn 2007 edition

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Have you found what you're looking for?
  • Please make it stop!
  • Yes, quite often when I'm in the queue to pick up the munchkins,
  • Agreed Adelle, just like any
  • Humor differences
  • But of course
  • Shakespeare thinking -- rhetorically
  • No Henry Owings?! All these
  • Misinterpreting Middlemarch
  • Laughing is highest achivement of mankind.


RSS: Fullposts

Intelligent Life | Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2007 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Terms and conditions | Intelligent Life magazine FAQs